WWW . TEL . COMMUNITY - The .tel domain forum

Welcome to the Tel.community.

You are invited to participate in the growing .tel
community!

To take full advantage of everything offered by
our forum, please log in if you are already a
member or join our community if you're not yet.

The registration at TelTalk.org is free and easy!

Thank you for participation!
WWW . TEL . COMMUNITY - The .tel domain forum

Welcome to the objective forum for .tel domains! Read it first when anything is happening with .tel!

Please join the LIVE CHAT for all REGISTERED members at the bottom of our forum!

Do you wonder why the breakthrough of .tel is so difficult?

Share

JH
Advanced Member
Advanced Member

Join date : 2012-04-29
Posts : 125 Points : 2727
Reputation : 26
Warning level : 100 %

Do you wonder why the breakthrough of .tel is so difficult?

Post by JH on Wed 04 Jul 2012, 2:11 pm

We know 3 kinds of TelHosting possibilities:

1.) Telnic in cooperation with over 100 registrars worldwide:
  • 5 kinds of templates with little differences
  • No possibility for customizing of attractive website design
  • Limited usage (No possibilities for CVs, blogs, text formatting and long text for product descriptions)
  • No flexible adjustment of content (Keywords and videos are located always at the bottom)


2.) TelChina in China:
  • Similar to number 1, but in addition with background pictures and individual web icons


3.) Telnames in the UK:
  • No subdomains
  • No integration of Telfriends
  • Contact entries limited to 20 pieces
  • No supply of external ads
  • No possibility for individual website design
  • Limited usage (No possibilities for CVs, blogs, text formatting and long text for product descriptions)
  • No flexible adjustment of content (Keywords and videos are located always at the bottom)


IMHO it wouldn’t be difficult to lead .tel to success: just provide us the missing features listed above and visitors won’t say anymore other TLDs are 1.000 times better than .tel!

    Current date/time is Thu 19 Oct 2017, 9:37 pm