WWW . TEL . COMMUNITY - The .tel domain forum

Welcome to the Tel.community.

You are invited to participate in the growing .tel
community!

To take full advantage of everything offered by
our forum, please log in if you are already a
member or join our community if you're not yet.

The registration at TelTalk.org is free and easy!

Thank you for participation!
WWW . TEL . COMMUNITY - The .tel domain forum

Welcome to the objective forum for .tel domains! Read it first when anything is happening with .tel!

Please join the LIVE CHAT for all REGISTERED members at the bottom of our forum!

Overview & Review of .tel Providers

Share
avatar
Rambo
Advanced Member
Advanced Member

Join date : 2012-06-23
Posts : 143 Points : 2924
Reputation : 21
Warning level : 100 %

Re: Overview & Review of .tel Providers

Post by Rambo on Sun 30 Sep 2012, 8:09 am

From the overview I identify the following deficits:
Telnic:
- No background pics
- No text on top of the domain
- No coupons
- No PDF upload
- No forms
- No product catalog
- No microblogging
- No call button
- No text formatting
- No RSS feeder
- No integrated e-mail solution
- No online payment
- No mobile payment
- No full view on cell phones
- No automatic login
- No website design without third-party tools
- No nice website design
- No nice mobile website
Telnames:
- Pictures too small
- Company logo too small
- Text too short
- No text on top of the domain
- No ads
- No headlines
- No forms
- No product catalog
- No microblogging
- No call button
- No profile management
- No text formatting
- No RSS feeder
- No integrated e-mail solution
- No Google Adsense
- No integrated search
- No social networking
- No data protection
- No online payment
- No mobile payment
- No full view on cell phones
- No Oauth
avatar
Tely
Senior Member
Senior Member

Join date : 2012-08-03
Posts : 211 Points : 7140
Reputation : 84
Warning level : 100 %

Re: Overview & Review of .tel Providers

Post by Tely on Sun 30 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm

Rambo wrote:From the overview I identify the following deficits:
Telnic:
- No background pics
- No text on top of the domain
- No coupons
- No PDF upload
- No forms
- No product catalog
- No microblogging
- No call button
- No text formatting
- No RSS feeder
- No integrated e-mail solution
- No online payment
- No mobile payment
- No full view on cell phones
- No automatic login
- No website design without third-party tools
- No nice website design
- No nice mobile website
Telnames:
- Pictures too small
- Company logo too small
- Text too short
- No text on top of the domain
- No ads
- No headlines
- No forms
- No product catalog
- No microblogging
- No call button
- No profile management
- No text formatting
- No RSS feeder
- No integrated e-mail solution
- No Google Adsense
- No integrated search
- No social networking
- No data protection
- No online payment
- No mobile payment
- No full view on cell phones
- No Oauth
The list for Telnames is even longer than the list for Telnic (22 : 18).
Telnic misses 7 features or options which are provided by Telnames already.
Telnames misses 11 features or options (half of all) which are provided by Telnic already.
avatar
Sunrise
Insider
Insider

Join date : 2012-08-10
Posts : 735 Points : 19635
Reputation : 540
Warning level : 100 %

Re: Overview & Review of .tel Providers

Post by Sunrise on Sun 30 Sep 2012, 2:56 pm

@Rambo

I’m very disappointed with you. You forgot to mention subdomains as the most important deficit at Telnames.
avatar
Rambo
Advanced Member
Advanced Member

Join date : 2012-06-23
Posts : 143 Points : 2924
Reputation : 21
Warning level : 100 %

Re: Overview & Review of .tel Providers

Post by Rambo on Sun 30 Sep 2012, 3:17 pm

Sunrise wrote:@Rambo

I’m very disappointed with you. You forgot to mention subdomains as the most important deficit at Telnames.
Shame on me! That was an inexcusable mistake made by me. Please let the holy office in London forgive me by implementing this improvement quickly!
avatar
Phillipe
Junior Member
Junior Member

Join date : 2012-09-20
Posts : 22 Points : 2173
Reputation : 5
Warning level : 100 %

Re: Overview & Review of .tel Providers

Post by Phillipe on Sat 13 Oct 2012, 10:28 am

This topic is awesome. Everybody can see the current development state at a glance.
avatar
Rambo
Advanced Member
Advanced Member

Join date : 2012-06-23
Posts : 143 Points : 2924
Reputation : 21
Warning level : 100 %

Re: Overview & Review of .tel Providers

Post by Rambo on Sat 13 Oct 2012, 10:46 am

Phillipe wrote:This topic is awesome. Everybody can see the current development state at a glance.
Let Telnic work on this and we'll get what we all have been waiting for:
http://www.teltalk.org/t434-request-for-all-old-new-forum-members-please-tell-us-your-technical-suggestions-to-improve-tel
avatar
Expert
Insider
Insider

Join date : 2012-08-10
Posts : 522 Points : 12556
Reputation : 351
Warning level : 100 %

Re: Overview & Review of .tel Providers

Post by Expert on Sat 13 Oct 2012, 11:02 am

avatar
TelKing
Advanced Member
Advanced Member

Join date : 2012-06-23
Posts : 94 Points : 3369
Reputation : 34
Warning level : 100 %

Re: Overview & Review of .tel Providers

Post by TelKing on Sat 13 Oct 2012, 4:35 pm

Expert wrote:
Rambo wrote:Let Telnic work on this and we'll get what we all have been waiting for:
http://www.teltalk.org/t434-request-for-all-old-new-forum-members-please-tell-us-your-technical-suggestions-to-improve-tel
Telnic won't do that: http://www.teltalk.org/t585-tel-is-very-confusing#2901
Then let's hope Telnic will give some incentives to registrars to do it for them.
avatar
Telnot
Advanced Member
Advanced Member

Join date : 2012-10-19
Posts : 160 Points : 5259
Reputation : 99
Warning level : 100 %

Re: Overview & Review of .tel Providers

Post by Telnot on Sat 20 Oct 2012, 2:21 am

This review is not good! Don't make the large further development public! Customers will become scared and will stick to their complicated hosting solutions they have always used before!

Sponsored content

Re: Overview & Review of .tel Providers

Post by Sponsored content


    Current date/time is Sun 19 Nov 2017, 10:46 pm