WWW . TEL . COMMUNITY - The .tel domain forum

Welcome to the Tel.community.

You are invited to participate in the growing .tel
community!

To take full advantage of everything offered by
our forum, please log in if you are already a
member or join our community if you're not yet.

The registration at TelTalk.org is free and easy!

Thank you for participation!
WWW . TEL . COMMUNITY - The .tel domain forum

Welcome to the objective forum for .tel domains! Read it first when anything is happening with .tel!

Please join the LIVE CHAT for all REGISTERED members at the bottom of our forum!

Telnames conceptual mistake

Share
avatar
Toptel
Senior Member
Senior Member

Join date : 2012-07-02
Posts : 447 Points : 12361
Reputation : 319
Warning level : 100 %

Re: Telnames conceptual mistake

Post by Toptel on Sun 10 Feb 2013, 12:41 pm

I have the perfect business strategy for Telnic: Firing all employees except 1 server administrator.
With soon 50,000 domains left, Telnic could survive comfortably.
avatar
Telnot
Advanced Member
Advanced Member

Join date : 2012-10-19
Posts : 160 Points : 5225
Reputation : 99
Warning level : 100 %

Re: Telnames conceptual mistake

Post by Telnot on Sun 10 Feb 2013, 1:02 pm

Telnic was faster than forum members, because they did that two years ago. 50,000 domains at Telnames or at other registrars?
avatar
Toptel
Senior Member
Senior Member

Join date : 2012-07-02
Posts : 447 Points : 12361
Reputation : 319
Warning level : 100 %

Re: Telnames conceptual mistake

Post by Toptel on Sun 10 Feb 2013, 1:30 pm

Telnot wrote:50,000 domains at Telnames or at other registrars?
In case that is a serious question, exact numbers are impossible to predict.
But this could be a realistic outlook for 2013:
Telnames: + 20,000
Telnic: - 100,000

maxi
Insider
Insider

Join date : 2012-08-27
Posts : 995 Points : 22199
Reputation : 466
Warning level : 100 %

Re: Telnames conceptual mistake

Post by maxi on Sun 10 Feb 2013, 3:33 pm

TelTalk wrote:Please consider also that I can defend this forum against legal measures only if I delete content with violation of law.
I think, that we all understand you in these matters.

avatar
Expert
Insider
Insider

Join date : 2012-08-10
Posts : 522 Points : 12522
Reputation : 351
Warning level : 100 %

Re: Telnames conceptual mistake

Post by Expert on Tue 12 Feb 2013, 12:40 pm

In case this should become reality, then Telnic has solved the issue:
http://www.teltalk.org/t978-cooperation-between-telnames-and-hibu-yell#5781
avatar
TelBlogger
Insider
Insider

Gender : Male
Join date : 2012-04-29
Posts : 613 Points : 15041
Reputation : 273
Warning level : 100 %

Re: Telnames conceptual mistake

Post by TelBlogger on Tue 12 Feb 2013, 12:48 pm

Toptel wrote:
Telnot wrote:50,000 domains at Telnames or at other registrars?
In case that is a serious question, exact numbers are impossible to predict.
But this could be a realistic outlook for 2013:
Telnames: + 20,000
Telnic: - 100,000

Yes, I expect people to be shocked at the level of drops this time around.

Last year people had some hope. But this last year has clearly shown us some hard truths about this extension and support for it from [name withheld for legal reasons].
avatar
Expert
Insider
Insider

Join date : 2012-08-10
Posts : 522 Points : 12522
Reputation : 351
Warning level : 100 %

Re: Telnames conceptual mistake

Post by Expert on Tue 12 Feb 2013, 1:03 pm

TelBlogger wrote:Yes, I expect people to be shocked at the level of drops this time around.
Then let’s hope Telnic will sell more .tels with Telnames than they will lose with other registrars.
avatar
ixida
Senior Member
Senior Member

Join date : 2012-07-05
Posts : 263 Points : 7495
Reputation : 115
Warning level : 100 %

Re: Telnames conceptual mistake

Post by ixida on Wed 13 Feb 2013, 5:36 pm

If Telnic don't want to build a good .tel directory, should we collect money for it? http://www.kickstarter.com
avatar
Natal
Advanced Member
Advanced Member

Join date : 2012-08-07
Posts : 63 Points : 3379
Reputation : 26
Warning level : 100 %

Re: Telnames conceptual mistake

Post by Natal on Wed 20 Feb 2013, 7:18 pm

avatar
FrankW.
Senior Member
Senior Member

Join date : 2012-10-08
Posts : 261 Points : 9205
Reputation : 133
Warning level : 100 %

Re: Telnames conceptual mistake

Post by FrankW. on Thu 21 Feb 2013, 5:48 pm

Perhaps this can help solving the problem, because we depend too much on Google:
http://searchengineland.com/20-signals-that-make-your-business-easier-to-find-in-local-search-engines-148496
avatar
FrankW.
Senior Member
Senior Member

Join date : 2012-10-08
Posts : 261 Points : 9205
Reputation : 133
Warning level : 100 %

Re: Telnames conceptual mistake

Post by FrankW. on Fri 22 Feb 2013, 6:40 am

One more hint. Make pages primarily for users, not for search engines:
http://www.grahamjones.co.uk/2013/blog/search/interflora-proves-seo-can-be-harmful.html

Sponsored content

Re: Telnames conceptual mistake

Post by Sponsored content


    Current date/time is Tue 17 Oct 2017, 12:56 pm